The question
Are we improving the current process, or is the current design itself the constraint?
What experience contributes
Robert’s program redesign moved delivery beyond a facility’s space limit. A separate curriculum change removed spending on resources that were not being used. Those examples prompt questions about delivery design and resource use; they do not establish a universal solution.
A practical response
Define the outcome the process exists to deliver. Map the current steps, waits, decisions, and resource use. Compare a targeted improvement with a different design, including the costs and demands of changing.
A useful established distinction
ASQ distinguishes improving an existing process through DMAIC from designing a new or substantially overhauled process through DMADV. The relevant lesson here is to make the choice between repair and redesign explicit.
What to test
Select a limited pilot with a baseline, quality guardrails, and an accountable owner. Check whether a faster or cheaper process transfers burden to someone else, reduces access, or weakens the intended outcome.
This is a Rudder & Keel practitioner perspective. Its proposed applications require assessment in the organization’s own context.