RESOLVECX RESEARCH SERIESSTUDY #009ONGOING RESEARCH

Selection & Readiness

Can we identify job-relevant readiness before hire—fairly, validly, and better than conventional screening?

CENTRAL RESEARCH QUESTION

Among applicants and prospective entrants to frontline contact-center work, which job-relevant and fairly assessable pre-employment capabilities predict training success, production transition, quality-adjusted performance, adaptability, sustainability and retention—and do those measures add meaningful predictive and decision value beyond conventional hiring information?

Why this study matters

ResolveCX will not design an assessment to confirm preferred candidate traits. Candidate measures must be grounded in job analysis, tied to defined criteria, evaluated for reliability and validity, monitored for subgroup differences and adverse impact, and compared with less burdensome or less exclusionary alternatives. A measure that predicts poorly, adds no incremental value, creates unacceptable inequity, or merely reproduces employer bias should be revised or rejected.

What the evidence currently suggests

Structured selection methods can predict job performance; prior experience is often weak; selection validity, fairness and adverse-impact controls are established requirements.

Evidence status: Strong selection-method foundation / specific gap. Published evidence can establish foundations and mechanisms, but it does not establish that a ResolveCX intervention produces these outcomes.

What ResolveCX still has to learn

Which capabilities predict contact-center outcomes and whether assessment is more useful for development/pathway placement than exclusion.

Why this matters to the larger thesis

Potential high-value capability, but a selection gate could conflict with the mission if false negatives or inequities are high.

Research status and limitations

This study is being published as ongoing research. Interviews, surveys, employer data, longitudinal evidence, validation, or replication may support, narrow, contradict, or reject the current hypotheses. Preliminary observations will not be presented as industry-wide conclusions.

Questions this study helps answer

Can contact center readiness be assessed before hire?

Study 009 asks whether job-relevant capabilities can predict training success, production transition, quality-adjusted performance, adaptability, sustainability, and retention better than conventional hiring information.

Will ResolveCX use a single readiness score?

Not unless evidence supports it. The protocol treats candidate characteristics as separate constructs and rejects measures that predict poorly, add no incremental value, create unacceptable inequity, or reproduce employer bias.